![]() ![]() Waterfox did solve (not totally but pretty close) the performance issues that i've been having with firefox and it's as costumizable as the later. What you can do in the meantime is to download and install an older version of Waterfox G6.0.6. Software makers usually fix these issues but it can take them some time. Software designed for 64-bit Windows editions can take advantage of faster RAM and processing speeds and greater stability in 64-bit systems. It really baffles my mind how does chromium and other engines want to be taken serious with only 4 basic buttons on it's toolbar - it's an insult to any user. Sometimes latest versions of the software can cause issues when installed on older devices or devices running an older version of the operating system. Waterfox is modified version of the Firefox source code specifically for machines running 64-bit versions of Windows. ![]() So i started to test every other browser i could get my hands on for a week or so ago and it just confirmed that i can't work properly with a browser that, for instance, doesn't let me, fully, natively, and in a simple way, costumize the toolbars. Anyway, i've been having problems with very slow or irresponsive firefox. I've been using mozilla/firefox since its inception. Pros: - as good as firefox, with better performance.Ĭons: - still some performance issues in my own setup (it may have to do with the gecko engine, not waterfox's fault).īottom Line: In my own experience and needs of productivity, Firefox's costumization options and overall layout far exceeds its lack of performance in comparison to other browsers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |